Intel v/s AMD

Light-hearted chat and discussion

Moderators: Murray, Jeff

Intel v/s AMD

Intel
13
46%
Amd
15
54%
Others
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 28

Intel v/s AMD

Postby [deXter] » Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:02 pm

Which one do you prefer and why?
Ad Muncher - best companions:

Opera - Fastest Browser
Onspeed - Fastest Web Accelerator
cFosSpeed - Best Traffic Shaper
User avatar
[deXter]
Addict
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:45 pm

Postby PaulM » Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:47 pm

'cause the Intel is a little better for video encoding performance. But like AMD for just about everything else including the price :)
PaulM
Active Member
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:34 pm

Postby Zelig » Mon Mar 21, 2005 7:55 pm

AMD for now, their price/performance is simply better for most things, and playing with 64 bit stuff is fun. :)
User avatar
Zelig
Active Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Canada

Postby thollian » Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:43 am

like Intel...and AMD....depends on what I am doing....

but right now, all my machines are Intel P4's....
-thollian
thollian
Active Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: USA

Postby war59312 » Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:41 am

I only use AMD. I have a personal grudge against Intel which I won't get into. ;)
Statistics for Ad Muncher v4.93.33707/4517
Adverts removed: 6,537,793
Bandwidth saved: 192,472 MB
Counter started: April 2, 2003

Image

6,537,793 items blocked - 192.4 GB saved - 3.1 weeks saved - 3,007,382 trackers blocked - 15,102,292 cookies blocked
war59312
Wiz
 
Posts: 892
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:03 am
Location: U.S.A

Postby Shamurai » Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:11 am

war59312 wrote:I only use AMD. I have a personal grudge against Intel which I won't get into. ;)


But isnt that the purpose of this thread? To promote debate?

I use AMD for the simple fact that I need great performance at low cost, if I could afford P4's, I would run them, simply because I disagree with amd's naming scheme (using a POWER RATING as opposed to the actual clock speed of the chip). If AMD ever released a chip that ran at the speed that matched its name, I would be in heaven!
This posting is provided "AS IS" with warranties of every kind, and confers all rights.
Shamurai
Master
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:05 pm

Postby Zelig » Tue Mar 22, 2005 7:57 pm

Shamurai wrote:
war59312 wrote:I only use AMD. I have a personal grudge against Intel which I won't get into. ;)


But isnt that the purpose of this thread? To promote debate?

I use AMD for the simple fact that I need great performance at low cost, if I could afford P4's, I would run them, simply because I disagree with amd's naming scheme (using a POWER RATING as opposed to the actual clock speed of the chip). If AMD ever released a chip that ran at the speed that matched its name, I would be in heaven!


Well, for quite a while, the power rating corresponded quite well to the clock speed of pentium 4s. Now that Intel has started using model names, the power ratings don't correspond to anything, so they're no worse than using model names/numbers.
User avatar
Zelig
Active Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Canada

Postby MarlboroKlingon » Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:08 pm

Though I wish AMD would name their chips with the actual clock speed and not a power rating, I'm otherwise happy.

My laptop had to go, but it got replaced with one of those bargain systems from Walmart.com - For $200, I'm happy with what I got, though it's been upgraded a bit..

AMD Sempron 2200 (1.5Ghz)
384 Megs RAM
120GB HD + 40GB HD

Seems this system tops out with a Sempron 3000 (2Ghz) and 2GB RAM, but that's plenty for what I use it for.
Qapla'!
MarlboroKlingon
New User
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: Lakeland, FL

Postby Zelig » Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:11 pm

Well, just ordered a bunch of new parts, including an Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8 Ghz). Hopefully I'm able to get it to around 2.4 Ghz. :)
User avatar
Zelig
Active Member
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Canada

Postby kml » Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:48 pm

For gaming I like AMD64 FX-55 and for business and various other production applications I like my P4.
kml
New User
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:21 pm

Postby loquat » Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:44 pm

Intel + Intel Chipset = Generally equates to stability (heat issues though)

Amd cpus are maybe technically superior but they lack a decent chipset to pair them with IMHO.

VIA chipsets (drivers) are probably the worlds buggiest POS. They are buggier than any Microsoft products out there. It's a shame that the mojority of AMD motherboards are powered by VIA POS.
loquat
Addict
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 4:19 am

Postby vantdo » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:14 am

loquat wrote:Intel + Intel Chipset = Generally equates to stability (heat issues though)

Amd cpus are maybe technically superior but they lack a decent chipset to pair them with IMHO.

VIA chipsets (drivers) are probably the worlds buggiest POS. They are buggier than any Microsoft products out there. It's a shame that the mojority of AMD motherboards are powered by VIA POS.

AMD CPUs do have a decent chipset to pair them with. The Nvidia nForce2/3/4 MBs.
vantdo
Active Member
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:58 pm

Postby Guest » Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:24 am

Adverts removed by Ad Muncher: 82,849
Approximate bandwidth saved: 647 MB

..got this program yesterday :P very very nice program
Guest
 

Postby Ahmetbaba » Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:40 am

i am using inter, but i prefer amd

cuz of gamespeed
Ahmetbaba
 


Return to The Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron